Jump to content

Sovman

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    457

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sovman

  1. Posted

    1 hour ago, Akame™ said:

    take this advice, started reading the manga again it's way better story wise nothing left out and it isn't as tedious as people think to read since every chapter takes about 20 minutes to read (maybe less depending on how fast you can read) only problem is that there is a fuck ton of chapters and there's two different manga

    20 minutes, tha fuk its a picture book, takes more like 3-5 minutes to read, what you doing for the rest of the 15 minutes 

    Spoiler

    HL9agMP.png

     

  5. Posted

    28 minutes ago, Joji said:

    I believe that this anime (alongside many others) can get you started into what I think is a great hobby,

    Its a terrible hobby which can suck up a large amount of your time and becomes addictive easily if you enjoy it. Also, it will very likely cause you to pick up bad habits.

    most anime suck balls apart from the occasional top tier series that comes out each year, I'm just to far gone and treat new episodes or anime series as check boxes that i tick off. 

     

     

     

    So if you still must watch anime then i shall now give you my list which you may use as reference

    http://eyeonanime.tv/anime-list/

     enjoy the next 15 year grind

    tenor.gif?itemid=3561328

    Scrune, lkgddr, Quinn and 1 other reacted to this

  15. Posted

    2 hours ago, Akame™ said:

    Personally i think trucks are better than normal cars, i think this because you can carry more if you're going on a longer road trip. However cars are better for going faster in shorter times.

    IMO i think ships are better than trucks, i think this because they carry a larger amount, which is more effective for longer journeys across the ocean. however i can appreciate trucks since they move faster on land then ships do.

  17. Posted

    So people like major and eraser and all the lvl 1's are around 700 elo on faceit. (1100 is elo for lvl 4)

    these lvl 1-2-3's fill up about 1/3 of 70% of the games that are currently being played. so imo restricting these will just make the hub rather ded.

    Assuming that we are getting around 25+- elo for each win in solo que on faceit free. this would take around 15-20 game wins in a row to get to lvl four

    1 hour ago, Danny said:

    A- Level 4 isn't exactly 'elitist' is it. It's ridiculously easy. You have 0 idea how long it takes. It's like me commenting on Nuclear Fusion. I haven't got a clue so I don't!

    Now this is the problem. For someone of our skill lvl this wouldn't take too long at all because it would be realistic for us to win a majority of the games we played at lvl 1-2-3 and assuming we played 3-4 games a day this would take a weeks worth of time.

    However, for people like eraser and major, etc. queuing solo into faceit is going be a grind and a half, as they are probs gonna be wining and losing the same amount of games each day meaning their elo won't chance much at all. but lets assume the best case and they win 2 games a day and only lose 1. (since 3 games a day is what most of these do anyways when playing the hub/gathers) this would still take 20 days of grind for them to get to lvl 4 on faceit just to be able to play the hub. if we include the days which they are playing bad or just struggling with matched teammates they are going to take upto a month or longer to get lvl 4. 

    TLDR: Idk about u but getting lvl 4 is a lot harder than u think for people who can't solo carry every game they play.

    3 hours ago, Danny said:

    Feel free to post your own Solutions while also complaining that this was the wrong way!

    My solution would be to turn it back to applying to be in the hub and make more mods/admins on the hub who can check and accept these applications then people in the hub can still play who are restricted by lvl and the admins won't struggle as much trying to manage the applications as there are more of them dealing with it.

    56 minutes ago, Lewis said:

    You just need a simple vetting process which is subject to personal interpretation if you want to keep the HUB open to the public. Just literally look at their level, check a few of their past games out to see that they're not going 1-24, check their country and if they can speak English. Perhaps a few more criteria, but I guarantee you these few steps will filter out most of the rabble. Didn't work out? Big deal, they play one game and then they're reported for whatever reason and gone.

    ^just saw this so i'll just drop it here since it works well with mine^

    ofc go with the current system for a few and make changes or not depending on how often gathers end up getting played.

    Major Chaos, Thunder, Eraser and 6 others reacted to this
×
×
  • Create New...